The common argument among those that favor allowing PEDs in sports is the notion that if everyone is doing it, then it is not an advantage.
Though each, including this one, can be read "stand-alone", you really should first read the main page here, which summarizes all of the findings and sets them out them in a coherent presentation.
Steroids Some Medical Background Before examining in detail the various claims made about medical effects and side effects of steroids, it would be wise to understand what a steroid is. Explanations are available on line in many places, a representative one being the Wikipedia article Anabolic steroid which, incidentally, "has been identified as one of the Professional athletes should not use steroids articles produced by the Wikipedia community".
The article presents a good overview of both the chemistry involved and of many of the issues related to steroids, though not all assertions in it are supported by the scientific literature. While an overview of steroids is useful, one must never forget that "steroids" is a word that encompasses a wide variety of individual substances.
While they all belong to a single family, and thus have many similarities in their effects, there are important differences between them, such as the alkylation method used in making them. The differences can be important. There are two medical questions about steroid use in baseball: What gains might it provide?
What harmful side effects might there be? We will examine each question separately. Normal Unaugmented Patterns Before we look at whether performance might be abnormal, it is obviously essential to first know what normality is. One of the much-too-frequently heard claims about the performances of older players those past their early 30s is that stable or increasing power "must" signify "cheating".
An old adage says that there is no harm in being a fool--harm is being a fool at the top of your lungs, and remarks like Anyone who's crossed the threshhold of 35 knows that you just don't get bigger and stronger with age--no matter how hard you work out I won't attribute it, to save the man some embarrassment rather prove it.
The simple, well-established scientific fact is that that's utter nonsense. Here are a few representative quotations from the literature: Strength and power declined beginning by age 40 in both women and men. Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol 52, Issue 5 BB] Isometric and dynamic strength increased up to the third decade, remained almost constant to the fifth decade, and then decreased with increasing age.
Ballplayers don't drop out of the game before their mids from lack of ability to power a baseball, but from declining ability to react quickly enough to meet the ball well or to move well enough to play a position or run the bases.
Anecdotal but interesting is the fact that Julio Franco's career Power Factor is 1. Gains From Steroids As "masculinizing" substances, steroids tend to amplify biological factors associated with hormone-governed masculine qualities, one of which is muscle development.
Although simple use of steroids will produce some modest increase in muscle mass, its real effects come into play when it is used in combination with substantial resistance training weight lifting or comparable machine exercise.
Steroids typically augment the muscle-building effects of such exercise. There are two critical points to be made about the effects of steroids in a muscle-development regimen. Degree of Gain The first critical point is that for every person there is an upper limit to the strength he or she can achieve.
No amount of exercises or steroids or bothover no matter how long a period, will ever enable anyone to throw automobiles around. That being so, the question devolves to whether any steroid can raise a person's upper limit beyond that obtainable only by exercise.
No study can answer that question, because all studies are necessarily limited to some finite, reasonable time period. But, as applied to baseball players--as opposed to bodybuilders or weight-lifters--that question is irrelevant.
No ballplayer is developing his musculature to the absolute maximum possible, and the proof is that no ballplayer shows musculature remotely like the freakish over-development not uncommonly seen on avid bodybuilders.
So the question cannot be "do steroids make a ballplayer stronger? Distribution of Gain Different sports emphasize different muscles. The arm strength critical to a swimmer is much less important to a runner. But--and this seems inadequately appreciated outside the medical profession--steroids do not affect all muscles alike.
There is a marked differential in their effects. The muscle groups that receive the lion's share of benefit from steroid use are those of the upper body. Steroidal effects on lower-body strength are far weaker: The principal advantages ascribed to anabolic steroids are those associated with androgenicity, or masculine traits.
Upper-body strength and muscularity are two such key traits.Oxandrolone, sold under the brand names Oxandrin and Anavar, among others, is an androgen and anabolic steroid (AAS) medication which is used to help promote weight gain in various situations, to help offset protein catabolism caused by long-term corticosteroid therapy, to support recovery from severe burns, to treat bone pain associated with osteoporosis, to aid in the development of girls.
Steroids Devastating Side Effect. The medical community seems to have a particular blind spot about these drugs, refusing to believe that steroids can cause . Jan 23, · Should We Accept Steroid Use in Sports? The debate over athletes' use of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs has taken on newfound urgency in .
“To study the use of steroids at the levels athletes currently use them is not going to happen,” said Wadler, a New York internist who is a former chairman of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s.
While an overview of steroids is useful, one must never forget that "steroids" is a word that encompasses a wide variety of individual substances. While they all belong to a single family, and thus have many similarities in their effects, there are important differences between them, such as the alkylation method used in making them.
The differences can be important. Wouldn't it be great to make nearly $ million a year simply to play a game? Tiger Woods, along with many other professional athletes, certainly think so.